![]() |
| Poster ridiculously drawn by B.C. Matthews while hanging out in Speakeasies. |
Here
I am taking a quick break from writing by...writing. I know. I'm a masochist.
So,
I recently took a break from short story writing and watched the flick "Midnight
in Paris" written and directed by Woody Allen. I have to admit that had I
known ahead of time that Allen wrote it, I probably would have said, "Nah,
I'll pass." While I didn't much care for the movie beyond the lit major
joy I got out of all the early 20th century writer and artist name dropping,
there was one point that interested me.
The
characters travel through time to an earlier "Golden Era" of their
imagination. Basically an escapist romantic time that is much better than
whatever current present you might be in. For the main character it was 1920's
Paris. For a character of that 1920's Paris, her chosen "Golden Era" was
La Belle Époque.
Generally,
I have several eras that I have dabbled in, and even created alternate
histories for. And I have other authors to blame for that. Though honestly I
would never actually want to live there, considering my body's predilection for
getting pneumonia, and the fact that I am classless, tasteless, and vulgar.
1.
The Napoleonic Era (roughly late 1790s to 1815): I have C.S. Forester, Patrick
O'Brien, and Naomi Novik to thank for my interest in things naval, and
Napoleon. While these books are written from the non-French point-of-view (considering
that Napoleon was doing a lot of conquering at musket and sword point) it is
because of these authors that I find it all quite dashing. Those handsome
uptight gentleman forced to be both the gentleman of means, and warriors. There
is a sense of both civilized warfare, and the brutal truth that war is ugly no
matter how you slice it.
2.
The Victorian Era and La Belle Époque (most of the
1800s from 1815 on): Steampunk has quite ruined my brain. It generally takes
the more romantic elements of the Victorian Era and imbues it with fun science
fiction-fantasy bits to make it that much more interesting. Though most Steampunk
authors I've read ignore the rampant prostitution, the poor class getting
poorer, the fog of London, the ridiculousness of medicine and its view of
women, the expanding views of mental health, the and other not-so fun bits of
history, it still harkens back to the grandness of affluence. To grand ballroom
dancing, to stuffy overly cautious etiquette, to visible wealth, to a time of
great artists painting their new view of the world, of absinthe parties, and
all of the romantic nonsense that I have grown to adore.
Yes, my NaNo novel was
very Victorian. I don't think I would have written it if not for my recent (and
first time) trip to Paris and the Musee D'Orsay, where finally seeing all those
Impressionist paintings I'd seen in Art History class right up close and in
person had a more profound effect on me than I thought.
More recently, there
are a few eras that I've wanted to look into a little more:
Late Tokugawa Shogunate
and Meiji Restoration-era Japan: I'd worry that whatever I wrote would be some
horrible knock off of a Tom Cruise fueled The
Last Samurai is a White Dude. Also, someone please tell me there is
Steampunk writing about the Meiji Restoration. Please. If not I might be forced to write some. And it will not be
pretty. It would require sooo much research.
and
Prohibition-era America:
How can you not love the idea of Speakeasies? Silent films? The Charleston?
Jazz?
So, what is your
"Golden Era?" If you could go back in time to some romanticized past,
what would it be?

4 Comments:
My "Golden Era" is anytime where I don't have to worry about dying of cholera, be expected to suffer through spousal abuse, or have my life choices be limited by men. Sooo... nowish, I guess. Or the future. But a happy, non-apocolyticy one.
Alice, history is a cruel mistress that way. But for writing, it's more about the romantic aspects of the past, though not always. But you're pretty much okay in the past if you are male and white...
Male, white and rich, you mean.
Male, white and rich, you mean.
Post a Comment